Article
Open Access
Expand
Laser-based powder bed fusion thermal history of IN718 parts and metallurgical considerations
1 ESI Group, Research & Innovation, 45145 Essen, Germany
2 Fraunhofer ILT, LPBF Application Development, 52074 Aachen, Germany
  • Volume
  • Citation
    Megahed M, Verhülsdonk M, Vervoort S, Dionne P. Laser-based powder bed fusion thermal history of IN718 parts and metallurgical considerations. Adv. Manuf. 2025(1):0003, https://doi.org/10.55092/am20250003. 
  • DOI
    10.55092/am20250003
  • Copyright
    Copyright2025 by the authors. Published by ELSP.
Abstract

Laser-based powder bed fusion (LB-PBF) as-built material properties; residual stresses and final component shape are dependent on the thermal history of the printed part. Design and optimization of the deposited material thus far depends on experimental trial and error. A systematic approach based on model informed optimization is missing; mainly due to the computational expense of resolving the scan path and performing the required transient simulations. In this work; the heat conduction equation is reformulated to enable accelerated simulations. The laser position and operating conditions are read from the build file. The laser trajectory throughout the component is resolved providing 3D temperature evolution. Simple demonstration parts exhibiting both hot and cold regions are used to induce different metallurgical responses of the deposited IN718. Thermocouples are used to validate calculated temperatures. CALPHAD based calculations utilize temperature predictions to obtain localized phase concentrations and predict the distribution of thermophysical properties throughout the build. Results are compared with hardness measurements confirming the accuracy of the overall modelling chain.

Keywords

additive manufacturing; thermal history; modeling; phase transformation; IN718; mechanical properties

Preview
References
  • [1] Liu F, Lin X, Huang C, Song M, Yang G, et al. The effect of laser scanning path on microstructures and mechanical properties of laser solid formed nickel-base superalloy Inconel 718. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509(13):4505–4509.
  • [2] Körner C, Helmer H, Bauereiß A, Singer RF. Tailoring the grain structure of IN718 during selective electron beam melting. MATEC Web Conf. 2014, 14:08001.
  • [3] Popovich VA, Borisov EV, Popovich AA, Sufiiarov VS, Masaylo DV, et al. Functionally graded Inconel 718 processed by additive manufacturing: Crystallographic texture, anisotropy of microstructure and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2017, 114:441–449.
  • [4] Keshavarzkermani A, Sadowski M, Ladani L. Direct metal laser melting of Inconel 718: Process impact on grain formation and orientation. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 736:297–305.
  • [5] Zhang C, Chen F, Huang Z, Jia M, Chen G, et al. Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: A review. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 764:138209.
  • [6] Attard B, Cruchley S, Beetz C, Megahed M, Chiu YL, et al. Microstructural control during laser powder fusion to create graded microstructure Ni-superalloy components. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 36:101432.
  • [7] Nadammal N, Mishurova T, Fritsch T, Serrano-Munoz I, Kromm A, et al. Critical role of scan strategies on the development of microstructure, texture, and residual stresses during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 38:101792.
  • [8] Wei HL, Mazumder J, DebRoy T. Evolution of solidification texture during additive manufacturing. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5(1):16446.
  • [9] Rai A, Helmer H, Körner C. Simulation of grain structure evolution during powder bed based additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 13:124–134.
  • [10] Mindt HW, Desmaison O, Megahed M, Peralta A, Neumann J. Modeling of Powder Bed Manufacturing Defects. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018, 27(1):32–43.
  • [11] Panwisawas C, Qiu C, Anderson MJ, Sovani Y, Turner RP, et al. Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: Thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Comput. Mater. Sci 2017, 126:479–490.
  • [12] Koepf JA, Gotterbarm MR, Markl M, Körner C. 3D multi-layer grain structure simulation of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Acta Mater. 2018, 152:119–126.
  • [13] Rosenthal D. The Theory of Moving Sources of Heat and Its Application to Metal Treatments. Trans. ASME. 1946, 68(8):849–865.
  • [14] Eagar T, Tsai N. Temperature fields produced by traveling distributed heat sources. Welding J. 1983, 62(12):346–355.
  • [15] Kamath C, El-dasher B, Gallegos GF, King WE, Sisto A. Density of additively-manufactured, 316L SS parts using laser powder-bed fusion at powers up to 400 W. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 74(1):65–78.
  • [16] Tang M, Pistorius PC, Beuth JL. Prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity for powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 14:39–48.
  • [17] Prisco U. Shape of the melt pool produced by a moving Gaussian heat source. Weld. World 2021, 65(11):2105–2118.
  • [18] Whalen BJ, Ma J, Balachandran PV. A Bayesian Approach to the Eagar-Tsai Model for Melt Pool Geometry Prediction with Implications in Additive Manufacturing of Metals. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2021, 10(4):597–609.
  • [19] Hann DB, Iammi J, Folkes J. A simple methodology for predicting laser-weld properties from material and laser parameters. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021, 44:445401.
  • [20] Wayne EK, Barth HD, Castillo VM, Gallegos GF, Gibbs JW, et al. Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing. J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 2014, 214(12):2915–2925.
  • [21] Hanemann T, Seyfert C, Holfelder P, Rota A, Heilmaier M. Dimensionless enthalpy as characteristic factor for process control in laser powder bed fusion. J. Laser Micro Nanoen. 2020, 15(3):257–266.
  • [22] Liu B, Fang G, Lei L. An analytical model for rapid predicting molten pool geometry of selective laser melting (SLM). Appl. Math. Mod. 2021, 92:505–524.
  • [23] Ji X, Wang Y, Liang SY. Analytical modeling of temperature evolution in laser powder bed fusion considering the size and shape of the build part. J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 2022, 301:117452.
  • [24] Duong E, Masseling L, Knaak C, Dionne P, Megahed M. Scan path resolved thermal modelling of LPBF. Addit. Manuf. Lett. 2022, 3:100047.
  • [25] Moran TP, Warner DH, Phan N. Scan-by-scan part scale thermal modelling for defect prediction in metal additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 37:101667.
  • [26] Wolfer AJ, Aires J, Wheeler K, Delplanque JP, Rubenchik A, et al., Fast solution strategy for transient heat conduction for arbitrary scan paths in additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30:100898.
  • [27] Wang ZJ, Srinivasan K. An adaptive Cartesian grid generation method for 'dirty' geometry. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids. 2002, 39:703–717.
  • [28] Common Layer Interface (CLI) version 2.0. Available: https://www.hmilch.net/downloads/cli_format.html?trk=public_post_comment-text (accessed on 17 April, 2018).
  • [29] Kramer T, Proctor F, Messina E. The NIST RS274NGC Interpreter - Version 3. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. Available: http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publicationsearch.cfm?pub_id=823374 (accessed on 17 April 2018).
  • [30] Sainte-Catherine C, Jeandin M, Kechemair D, Ricaud JP, Sabatier L. Study of dynamic absorptivity at 10.6 µm (CO2) and 1.06 µm (Nd-YAG) wavelengths as a function of temperature. J. Phys. IV France 1991, 01(C7):C7–151–C157–157.
  • [31] Hosaeus H, Seifter A, Kaschnitz E, Pottlacher G. Thermophysical properties of solid and liquid inconel 718 alloy. High Temp.-High Pressures 2001, 33:405–410.
  • [32] Pottlacher G, Hosaeus H, Wilthan B, Kaschnitz E, Seifter A. Thermophysikalische Eigenschaften von festem und flüssigem Inconel 718. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 382(1–2):255–267.
  • [33] Cao L, Yuan X. Study on the numerical simulation of the SLM molten pool dynamic behavior of a nicker-based superslloy on the workpiece scale. Materials 2019, 12(14): 2272.
  • [34] Wei LC, Ehrlich LE, Powell-Palm MJ, Montgomery C, Beuth J, et al. Thermal conductivity of metal powders for powder bed additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21:201–208.
  • [35] Hooper PA. Melt pool temperature and cooling rates in laser powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 22:548–559.
  • [36] Panwisawas C, Tang YT, Ghoussoub J, Reed RC. Additive manufacturability of Nickl-based superalloys: Composition-process induced vapourization. In Superalloys 2020, Cham: Springer, 2020. pp. 1024–1032
  • [37] Mosbah S. Grain structure and segregation modeling using coupled FV and DP model. In 8th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives, Pennsylvania, USA, September 28–October 1, 2014, pp. 2
  • [38] Sanchez S, Smith P, Xu Z, Gaspard G, Hyde CJ, et al. Powder bed fusion of nickel-based alloys: A review. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2021, 165:103729.
  • [39] Ury N, Neuberger R, Sargent N, Xiong W, Arroyave R, et al. Kawin: An open source Kampmann-Wagner Numerical (KWN) phase precipitation and coarsening model. Acta Mater. 2023, 255:118988.
  • [40] Rielli VV, Theska F, Godor F, Stanojevic A, Oberwinkler B, and et al. Evolution of nanoscale precipitates during common alloy 718 ageing treatments. Mater. Des. 2021, 205:109762.